Like This on Facebook

Low Down // Loyola // April 2012

Posted in Low Down - Archive

When I saw the "Make Kony Famous" video all over Facebook, I wasn’t quite sure what to make of the hype. Mostly, I wrote it off as a scam or a joke. So I didn’t see the video until a week after it hit the Internet during a Theology class discussion. But after seeing the video, I was intrigued and somewhat concerned about the ideas presented.

If you haven’t seen the video, Joseph Kony is a Ugandan rebel who tops the International Criminal Court’s Most Wanted Fugitives list for crimes against humanity, specifically for abducting an estimated 10,000 children, forcing the boys to become soldiers and the girls to become sex slaves.

Last year, due to the persistence of an activist group, the United States sent over military advisers to help the Ugandan government locate Kony and turn him over to the ICC. Now, the leaders of this group are encouraging citizens to keep the pressure on Congress in order to ensure the U.S. military stays in Uganda until Kony is brought to justice.

Obviously, our whole class recognized that Kony’s actions are wrong and must be stopped; we didn’t agree, however, on what role the U.S. should take. Parts of the class wholeheartedly supported the video and felt that sending U.S. soldiers over is the best course of action. But this is reminiscent of the manhunt that went on for 10 years in search of Osama bin Laden and even now, after his death, the U.S. has soldiers in Afghanistan and spends an estimated $106 billion annually there.

That begs the question, if the U.S. has no material interest in Uganda, why are U.S. troops risking their lives for this cause? The answer seems relatively simple: Those children matter and it is an insult to all mankind to allow this kind of behavior to continue. So perhaps it is worth the risk to send our troops over there.

For me, at least, a larger concern is what happens if and when Joseph Kony is found. The video largely ignores this, naively stating that all the children will simply go back to their families. But it isn’t that simple. Many of their families are already dead, the first people that these young "soldiers" killed.  And even if the family is alive, becoming a child soldier inflicts intense psychological damage and many of the abducted children are likely irrevocably altered, making them unfit for normal society. So what’s to be done?

Certainly, the U.S. is capable of sending forces to Uganda to find them, but I’m not sure that the country is ready for another long commitment. We are only now making plans to leave Afghanistan.

As someone in my class said, "At least they are taking a first step." And that’s true; at least these people are taking a stand for what they believe in. I just hope that everyone who contributes to this cause realizes the possible consequences of taking military action.

Caelin Miltko

Publications Staff

Junior

 

Low Down // Loyola // June 2012

Posted in Low Down - Archive

By Samantha Manley

The month of May can only mean one thing for us high school seniors: graduation. With family and friends arriving for the big day, this time of year can be very hectic. By now, most of us know where we’ll be and what we’ll be doing next year, but that doesn’t make it any less scary. Not only are we being uprooted from everything we’ve ever known, we are also losing a majority of the people we’ve spent the last four y

Low Down

Posted in Low Down - Archive

Amongst all the problems in this world, I believe one is often overlooked, the crisis of modern male immaturity. As a man, I am the first to admit that, I am immature. Every man is immature. Due to this adolescent nature, no man is willing to admit it. We try to prove our maturity and "manliness" with cheap ploys, such as knowing how to throw a punch or using words like philosophunculist. But behind all of that, men are juvenile, crude beings.

Commercials for cell phones, fast food, beer and deodorants offer up an infantilized version of masculinity that has become very noticeable for a while now. These grown men act like boys – and are richly rewarded for it. It has been engraved in everyone’s minds that if men act this way then it is just the social normality. When was the gentleman replaced with the bumbling fool?

Don’t misunderstand me: I believe everyone should always stay in touch with their inner child. That is something a person should never lose. I for one am very proud of my copious collection of comic books. It’s not a question of their hobbies, but rather their attitudes. Younger men need to change by accepting responsibilities in their lives. Younger men need to be just that … men rather than the babies we can so often be. So often we hear women calling their spouses or significant others their extra child, someone they need to look after and deal with albeit affectionately.  However, while still maintaining some "boyish charm," men need to take on more of a role as men in the lives of people they care about.

Until we learn to do this, though, here are some tips in the art of dealing with those men (whether they be brothers, sons, fathers, friends, students or significant others) on a daily basis. First, realize men are all idiots, we laugh at crude humor, and we can’t help but giggle at the word ‘duty.’  Second we need help in social situations, we are awkward and don’t understand the repercussions of the things we say. Third, we need positive reinforcement at times; a "Great job champ" can really change us for the better. Fourth, make sure to guide a man on his pathway to maturity. Without guidance, there is nothing to stop us from going back to our juvenile ways.

We are all living in a world where women have to babysit men, and help them through each day. Gone are the days where men were men; we are living in a world where men need help getting through each day intact. I apologize for every man out there, we are too proud to admit that we need help growing up. This isn’t an informational column; this is a giant cry for help. We need to become the gentlemen of days of old.

Bowen West

Hellgate Lance

Assistant News Editor

Senior

Low Down

Posted in Low Down - Archive

Loyola

Every other Thursday, the halls of Loyola Sacred Heart look like an American flag. Red, white, and blue polo shirts worn over khakis and under athletic sweatshirts are the uniforms required on Mass days. At least 10% of our 180 mornings revolve around finding this uniform we all dread because all we want is to wear jeans.

We know that standing in Mass we look like we belong, that we truly are the family our teachers and alumni talk about, but as soon as Thursday is over, we all return to our own styles. And this is what I appreciate most about my school--the diversity of personalities.

With only 170 students at Loyola, I can get to know every person in every class. As I prepared for this article, I wandered the halls inquiring what is cool at Loyola and what we respect about each other. That day, it happened to be “Classy Friday”—a tradition started last year by my class. To end the week on a good note and start the weekend with class, everyone dresses to impress and, at the same time, expresses his or her own style. Student Body President Tawnie Kerr—in high heels, black dress pants, glasses, and a button up—responded that, “Being your own person gives people the chance to get to know you. Loyola has fostered the freedom of individuals to push each other. We understand the standards are set and try our best to live up to them.”

At Loyola, these standards, whether for uniforms or athletics or academic performance, create a drive within our student body to do its best and to respect each other and ourselves. “There’s the whole positive peer pressure thing that we have going for us here,” junior Leo Bird observed. My experience at Loyola has helped me understand myself and how I want others to see me. Being myself is cool – and that has been supported by everyone around me and embraced by my classmates.

By the time I was a junior, I noticed that every person in my class had asserted him/herself like I had. For example, senior Johnny Medeiros shows his personal style through his kitty cat t-shirts, a butterfly sweatshirt, and Velcro shoes. At first, this attire is a little confusing, due to his starting rank on Loyola’s Varsity football team, his 6 foot 5 stature and ability to grow a full man beard, but that is the Johnny we have known for all of high school and we know that and love it.

Loyola has given me and many others the understanding that being who we are is cool, and being amongst friends enables us to strive for success because it’s what is expected. Even on “Classy Fridays,” it’s cool to see who can get into and look classiest. That’s what’s cool at Loyola-- the environment of the school and the camaraderie we experience as students. Attending LSH shows us that being who we are is cool.

– By Kelly Eppard

Sentinel

Dances as we know them are over,” Sentinel Principal Tom Blakely said. “I can’t do this anymore. I’ve changed my thinking on a school’s necessity to provide an opportunity to go to a dance. And there’s only one reason—sexual behavior. Grinding. I can’t sit on the sidelines anymore.”

Blakely decided to take action on this issue after chaperoning this September’s Sadie Hawkins dance—a dance that ironically took place the night before the Missoulian’s last article on grinding at school dances. 

“That dance just tipped the balance for me,” Blakely said. “I can’t turn a blind eye anymore.”

Since becoming principal in 2008, Blakely has repeatedly notified students that inappropriate dancing must stop. However, the explicit behavior only increased and now Blakely is on the brink of canceling all dances next year, with the exception of prom.

“I never thought it would get to this,” Blakely said.

On a positive note, Blakely is giving students a final chance to exhibit proper dance behavior:  at November’s Fireside dance, an annual fundraiser for the cheerleaders, students will be given one hour. If students grind, Blakely will turn on the lights and send people home without a refund.

However, if students can manage to dance appropriately for an entire hour, the lights will remain down, the music will keep blasting, and students will get another hour. This process will repeat for the subsequent hours of the dance. If all proceeds smoothly the rest of the night, students will have earned the preservation of the following year’s dances.

“I’ve given the students two years and made it clear that I don’t approve. In my mind, I’ve been absolutely fair about this,” Blakely said. “Dancing is about socializing and having fun. I feel I have a good relationship with students, but I’m not coming between them at a dance. It’s easier to turn the lights on and go home.”

Blakely’s threat is not groundbreaking in Missoula. Hellgate Principal Russ Lodge has already canceled dances due to improper conduct. Big Sky Principal Trevor Laboski is in the process of writing a code of conduct for students that strictly prohibits grinding.

Sentinel’s biggest concern is the number of student clubs that rely on dances for the majority of their fundraising. The Thespian Troupe and cheerleading program both receive over 80 percent of their yearly income through dances. Key Club has already lost the majority of its funding after the spring Hawaiian dance was cut a few years ago by former Sentinel Principal Rob Watson for similar reasons and not reinstated by Blakely.

Blakely has asked the student government to become involved in the campaign to get kids to clean up their acts. Student Body President Ryan Halligan and Vice President Jace Holyoak are planning an assembly to help students learn new dance steps and to make them aware of the serious nature and repercussions of the continuation of grinding at school dances.

“Face to face with a little space,” Blakely said. “That’s all I’m asking.”

– By Kelly Balfour - Konah Editor in Chief
– By Max TeSoro - Associate Editor

Hellgate

Hellgate-PhotoTeens are infamously difficult. As we are constantly reminded, teens are moody, fickle, and disrespectful. The media, from Modern Family to Fox News, is happy to reinforce this view. As far back as the 1950s, when the concept of “teenagers” was still new, teens were popularly portrayed as disaffected, rabble rousing, and generally impolite. Now, this view was definitely founded in fact. The postwar teens were a class of people unencumbered by the hardships and deprivations their elders had experienced. But they perceived themselves to be trapped in a repressive, bland culture of sameness and mediocrity. Adults were distrustful of this newly emergent youth culture, and this distrust fed the growing generation gap. This gap was never really bridged, as teens from 1955 to 2011 will tell you. Adults treat teens, perceived to be so different from themselves, with fear and contempt. As a teen male, I am scrutinized upon entering a store or restaurant in a way no adult man would be. Teens are lampooned in the popular press through comic strips such as Zits. Moral panics concerning the supposedly deviant behavior of adolescents periodically sweep the nation.

And I must confess that I’m confused as to why.

Sure, teenagers are a little absentminded sometimes. They are obsessed with acceptance by their peers, often to a fault. They experiment with sex, alcohol, and drug use. They are sometimes a bit rowdy. But is that really cause for the general societal disapproval of teens? All teens want is to be treated as adults. But parents, convinced that teens are really still just children, are reluctant to do so. So adults end up interfering in places where interference isn’t necessary in order to “protect” adolescents. A perfect example of adult hysteria over perceived dangers within teen culture is the “rainbow party” panic of the early 2000s. In 2003, Oprah Winfrey dedicated a segment of her wildly popular show to the “growing trend of rainbow parties”. Rainbow parties, Oprah informed America’s mothers, are parties in which a group of girls each wear a different color of lipstick and administer oral sex to a group of boys. At the end of the night, the boy with the most colors of lipstick “wins”. This caused massive uproar, parental panic, and bible thumping by conservative commentators. But a New York Times investigation in 2005 unearthed no evidence that any “rainbow parties” had ever actually occurred. Anywhere. Before the “Oprah” segment, no one had ever heard of rainbow parties. Teens were involved in no such lurid acts, and adults simply mucked about trying to prove that they had.

In short, teens just want to be treated as adults. Teens don’t care for childish condescension. They would rather avoid moralistic sermonizing about the corruption of today’s youth. Today’s youth is in all likelihood no better and no worse than their parents or their grandparents were. Each generation just wants to prove itself, and to tackle the problems the previous ones left behind.

– By Jason Hogan